"I'm an angel of the Lord."

just-laff: egberts: if i ever met a genie i wouldnt wish for a million dollars id wish that...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:15:09 -0700

egberts:

if i ever met a genie i wouldnt wish for a million dollars id wish that whenever i bought something i’d always have the right amount of money to pay for it in my pocket

you are one of the great thinkers of our time

craptastics: One day, when I was little, I ran away and hid...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:13:07 -0700

craptastics:

One day, when I was little, I ran away and hid in a cave. That’s where I met them.
They were blind, just like me, so we understood each other. I was able to learn Earthbending; not just as a martial art, but as an extension of my senses. For them, the original Earthbenders, it wasn’t just about fighting. It was their way of interacting with the world.

TOPH FOREVER TOPH

uh-oh-pekinducks: kingofscandinavia: aph Olympic...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:04 -0700

uh-oh-pekinducks:

kingofscandinavia:

aph Olympic parade

Guess who just fangasmed. Like. OVER NINETHOUSAND TIMES

hannibalthecanibal: vachelsstrife: wibbly-wobbly-timeywimeystuf...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:10:59 -0700

hannibalthecanibal:

vachelsstrife:

wibbly-wobbly-timeywimeystuff:

gallifrey-feels:

the-timelord-girl-who-hunts:

iseewhatyoudidier:

fiftyshadesoffandoms:

akiglancy:

gayest sport on earth

somebody’s obviously never heard of turkish oil wrestling

WHAT

OH MY GOD I AM CRYING

you have not LIVED until you’ve seen live Turkish oil wrestling.

why is he putting his hand in his pants

That’s how you win. By securing a grip on the “kisbet” (the special type of pants the wrestlers wear) and then pinning the opponent is how victory is achieved. The loser will then kiss the victor’s hand as a sign of respect and admiration.

that sport was so made up as an explanation for two guys getting caught going at it

itscstm: remember when yugioh was straight fucked up.

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:09:50 -0700

itscstm:

remember when yugioh was straight fucked up.

thefrogman: By Phil McAndrew [website | tumblr | twitter] [h/t:...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:09:23 -0700

thefrogman:

By Phil McAndrew [website | tumblr | twitter]

[h/t: tastefullyoffensive]

humorcat: darrynek: the nominees are leonardo dicaprio leonardo dicaprio leonardo...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:52:36 -0700

humorcat:

darrynek:

the nominees are

leonardo dicaprio

leonardo dicaprio

leonardo dicaprio

leonardo dicaprio

leonardo dicaprio

and the winner is *opens envelope*

adele

I hate to turn up out of the blue uninvited

recordsandcigarettes: 1-indsey: The only known...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:50:53 -0700

recordsandcigarettes:

1-indsey:

The only known video footage of Anne Frank

I can’t think of any reason why someone would not reblog this.

If this isn’t interesting/sad to you, then I don’t know what you like in life.

Can’t we hit 1,000,000 notes? This is such a rare shot, everyone should see it.

youngrecklesstupid: eyesonfirre: massugarr: omfg why are you...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:05:09 -0700

youngrecklesstupid:

eyesonfirre:

massugarr:

omfg why are you doing this to me

who gave u the right

no matter how many times this gos on my dash i shall always reblog.

orima-kazooie: ygocanonshuffle: can you imagine being the mother of a yu-gi-oh character you spend...

Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:04:35 -0700

orima-kazooie:

ygocanonshuffle:

can you imagine being the mother of a yu-gi-oh character

you spend the nine months of your pregnancy so excited for your child, and then he’s born with hair like this

and you’re like, “shit, look at that hair. he’s obviously going to be a protagonist. what’s going to happen to him 15 years from now?”

“I don’t want to be a tragic backstory”

Are we special or just weird?: Remember how Kangaroo Jack was relentlessly marketed as a family film...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:50:07 -0700

Are we special or just weird?: Remember how Kangaroo Jack was relentlessly marketed as a family film...:

confusedtree:

Remember how Kangaroo Jack was relentlessly marketed as a family film about a talking kangaroo in a hoodie who does impressions in the trailers and commercials and was even nominated for an MTV Movie Award for best CGI character and his nominee clip reel included all those scenes specifically and…

iamsupremecommanderofthisvessel: neraiutsuze: #Jack Sparrow:...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:34:18 -0700

iamsupremecommanderofthisvessel:

neraiutsuze:

#Jack Sparrow: Accepting You for Whatever Gender You Decide to Be Since 2003

#There should be a Captain in that tag somewhere

#Jack Sparrow: Captaining You for Whatever Captain You Captain to Captain since Captain

Close enough

tin-pan-ali: kanayaks: who put the glad in gladiator HERC- U- LES

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:54:33 -0700

tin-pan-ali:

kanayaks:

who put the glad in gladiator

HERC- U- LES

mono11: Did I ever mention that time me and my friends...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:53:22 -0700

mono11:

Did I ever mention that time me and my friends combined forces to form Will Smith?

sbahjification: neocarleen: llisbeth-salamanderr: “Love the...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:52:56 -0700

sbahjification:

neocarleen:

llisbeth-salamanderr:

“Love the fetus, hate the child.”

America makes it near impossible for a woman to stay autonomous—hard to get family planning resources/make the choice of getting an abortion, and harder to get child care support after the baby is born. Leaving women destitute and dependants everywhere.

Look at Canada! Not only do we give almost a full year off, it can be either maternity or paternity. That’s right, daddy can stay home with the baby while the mother goes back to work. And the leave can be also be split between them. For example, the mother could take six months, and then the father could take the other six. Did I also mention that the parent on leave continues to receive pay and is guaranteed their job back?

#I think we make fun of Canadians so much because secretly we want to be them

whycantithinkofacoolname: sillylaureate: theknighttoyourtime: ...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:51:31 -0700

whycantithinkofacoolname:

sillylaureate:

theknighttoyourtime:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

Thank you for your time.

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

Rather unlikely!

Actually, Mr. Godot!!

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

Hold on there, pups. You’re all going in completely different directions. Shih-na, if you will?

Lang Zi says: “The truth lies not at the exit, but rather, shines outside the maze itself.”

You need to see past the boundaries given to you in order to figure out the actual purpose and, as much as I’d hate to admit, both Mr. Prosecutor and the crow-girl have some pretty tame ground under their feet with those assumptions.

As said before, it’s logical to assume the photographer is merely depicting the method used in order to get the results shown in the second photo—and it can be just that.

But what if it’s something else entirely?

We’re all wolves who’ve been swindled by the coyote that has stolen our kill. How do we know if the photographer just isn’t using some clever ploy to get us all confused? He could have taken these pictures separately and simply put them together with getting us riled up in mind.

I think we all need to reconsider our options, here.

Casually brings it back.

amazing use of gifs, ladies and gentleman

knifefarty: when u Dad com home and make hte lasagna

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:49:38 -0700

knifefarty:

when u Dad com home and make hte lasagna

queendread: I don’t understand the USA, all your roads are straight and all your cities look like...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:49:10 -0700

queendread:

I don’t understand the USA, all your roads are straight and all your cities look like they were planned using Excel.

Everyone knows the only way to build a city is to wait until a bunch of tiny villages merge together over centuries and create a sprawling clusterfuck of winding roads that make no sense and have no street signs and are impossible to navigate unless you’ve lived there all your life.

sarah-urie: foodtrucker: I was born at an incredibly young age i told this to my english teacher...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:29:19 -0700

sarah-urie:

foodtrucker:

I was born at an incredibly young age

i told this to my english teacher and she almost kicked me out of the class

feministdisney: oliviawhen: What if sleeping beauty became a...

Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:25:58 -0700

feministdisney:

oliviawhen:

What if sleeping beauty became a knight instead?

A mini project I’ve been thinking about for awhile. You can find a backstory comic [here].

the graphic alone is pretty arresting!